Sunday, July 21, 2019

Capitalism or Democratic Socialism: What’s the Difference and Why Pragmatism Counts


In the last two years, media coverage of socialism has become increasingly common. Of course, a lot of the criticism leveled against socialism comes from Republicans/conservatives, who are the traditional opponents of that economic system and strong supporters of capitalism. Although many Democrats are also talking up socialism, it’s in a form many of us may not be familiar with, democratic socialism. In this short discussion, I focus briefly on the differences between capitalism and democratic socialism and why voters should care about which prevails in America’s near-term future.

Capitalism is an economic system of private ownership of capital and the means of production that is focused on the creation of wealth by owners (including stockholders). That system is also characterized by competition between companies striving for market dominance. In a real world capitalistic society, the production and pricing of goods and services are determined by the market. However, a certain amount of government regulation and intervention may pertain. The down-sides of capitalism include monopolistic behavior, price-fixing, stock manipulation and fraud, negative externalities damaging the environment, a lack of competition, creation of financial elites and inequality, and exploitation of labor and consumers.

Democratic socialism (and plain vanilla socialism) differs from capitalism in supporting various forms of worker control of firms and various levels of government control of investment. The goal of democratic socialism is to shift power from corporate capital and the One Percent (the wealthy elite) to workers and even consumers. Unlike the social democracies of Western Europe that are compatible with regulated capitalism, democratic socialists are fundamentally anti-capitalistic and most believe government at various levels and scales should encourage (force) privately owned businesses to turn over as much operational control as possible to workers.

Here’s the gospel according to the official Democratic Socialists of America’s website: “To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.” As part of that radical transformation, the workers and consumers who are affected by businesses should own and control them. That “social” ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Although the large concentrations of capital in economic sectors, such as energy and heavy industry, may necessitate some form of government ownership, many consumer goods industries might be best run as cooperatives. Source: https://www.dsausa.org/about-us/what-is-democratic-socialism/

The downsides of democratic socialism include a decreased emphasis on entrepreneurship, de-emphasis on individual achievement, increased government control, increased bureaucracy and a concomitant decline in efficiency, decrease in competitive drive, and uncertainty over how transition from capitalism to social control of companies would be financed.

It should be obvious that those two systems are not only very different but also that only one, capitalism, is in effect today in America. Replacing it with democratic socialism would necessarily involve widespread and fundamental changes to our country and potentially significant socioeconomic disruptions.

Here’s my bottom line. The typical American doesn’t give a rat’s ass about economic systems as such. They basically want the government to work well while leaving them alone but also to make sure they are warm in the heart of winter and cool in the heat of summer. In their heart of hearts, ordinary Americans want to drive the biggest-baddest Ford pick-up, a top of the line mongo SUV, and a Mercedes Benz AMG or two; own five or six multi-million dollar houses located in the world’s great cities; vacation on a 200-foot yacht in Saint-Tropez or Tahiti; ski in Gstaad; and belong to exclusive country clubs. Deep down all those average, working- and middle-class Americans want what Karl Marx failed to realize would prove the fallacy of his elegant theorizing: they just want to be as rich and powerful as Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos. They desperately want capitalism to work for them exactly the way Good Witch Glinda worked for Dorothy.

But, in some deep recess of their primitive lizard brain stems, those typical Americans know all those Power Ball and Mega Millions tickets are not going to pay off and no Uncle Roscoe or Aunt Minnie is going to kick the bucket and leave them rolling in umpty billion smackeroos. So, what do all those people depend on to save them in their old age from merciless penury and homelessness? Two things: Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security, programs created by Democrats and despised by Republicans, who correctly bash them as socialist.

What all that boils down to is if average voters think Democrats are moving far to the left under the influence of democratic socialists like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and if one of the Party’s hardline leftists becomes its candidate for President promising to get rid of nasty old capitalism, their fear and loathing will drive them to shitcan nearly every Democrat running for public office and re-elect that flaming asshole, Donald Trump. In the coming elections, if the Democratic Party cannot win a majority of independent and moderate voters, people whose livelihoods and very existence depend on capitalism, it’s game over for the presidency and for all too many Congressional seats.

If that’s not want you want, it’s time to get off your butts and start financially supporting more moderate Democratic Party candidates and get a lot more vocal about why you are supporting those candidates. We are facing a political disaster of the first magnitude in the coming election and do not have the luxury of misinterpreting the severity of that situation. If we don’t get our act together to defeat Trump now and argue about moving left later, we’re looking at a full blown catastrophe.

In this crisis, pragmatism must prevail over ideological purity and grandiose leftist dreams or Trump will be re-elected and we’ll be holding our heads in our hands, wondering what the Hell went wrong. Again.