Saturday, May 7, 2011

Shoe Shine


I polished my shoes last night. During that comfortable hour I became immersed in a fascinating fusion of past and present. For the countless time as I brought the cardboard box containing the shoe-shining paraphernalia from the cabinet to the basement workbench I was reminded of my childhood. My father required us three boys to polish our own shoes well before we were teenagers. We each had our own brush, several old cloths, and two or three shared tins of polish stored in a beat-up cardboard box in a basement cabinet beneath the stairs.
As a small rebellious boy how I hated being forced to clean and shine my shoes. It was a mindless drudgery I had to be driven to, head hanging down, lips pursed together, pissed off but not daring to show it too openly. But, somewhere along the line, all that youthful antipathy to shoe-shining disappeared. Today, in my sixties, I derive quite a bit of satisfaction and pleasure from that simple act.
The still sturdy but much abused cardboard box in which I have stored the family’s shoe shining equipment for more than three decades contains all anyone could ask for in terms of bringing a dirty or scuffed pair back to brilliance. Two brushes for black shoes, two for burgundy and brown shoes. In both cases one brush is for the first coat of polish and the second brush, with finer and denser horsehair bristles, is for the second coat, if and when I’m ambitious enough to undertake the extra effort. Several old white athletic socks to apply the polish. Black edge dressing. Black dye. Saddle soap. Two different types of mink oil for waterproofing winter shoes and boots. Three or four containers of liquid polish for women’s shoes. And at least six cans of polish for men’s shoes. No doubt, I am well prepared to shine shoes.
If I remember correctly, the evolution from barely tolerating shoe shining as a necessary evil to enjoying it came during my first year in college. At that time, all male freshmen and sophomores at Saint Louis University had to take Air Force Reserve Officers Training Corps courses, the dreaded ROTC, pronounced rot-C. We had to wear those cheesy blue uniforms to drill every Tuesday or Thursday and pretend we wanted to rip the life from our enemies, real or imagined. It was 1962 and the conflict in Viet Nam was still largely on the back burner but was moving inexorably toward full throttle. Highly polished shoes were an integral part of the uniform. Not just casually shined but spit-polished, or else demerits and extra drill were the order of the day.
For the uninitiated, a spit-polish meant exactly that. You spat into the can of polish, mixed it into a semi-gelatinous mess, and applied it to your shoes, working the mixture into a small section of the leather with a soft, damp cotton rag. The trick was to rub the polish into a small section of leather until your cloth was nearly dry and the polish was history. And then you did it all over. And again. And again. And again. Until your shoes sparkled like black diamonds. And I do mean sparkled.
The first several weeks in ROTC I went to a small shoe-shine parlor located in a barber shop in an old row of commercial stores on Grand Boulevard. But, at $5 a shine, it wasn't long before I was persuaded to do the job myself and save two and a half hours of hard-earned wages.
My first spit-polish, performed sitting on the kitchen floor, took over an hour. But afterwards I could have shaved in the resulting reflection. No exaggeration. It was spectacular. In some vague, poorly thought out way, the spit polish end result, a pair of shoes that shined spectacularly, appealed to my sense of order and neatness.
So, for the next two school years I spit-shined my shoes the night before each ROTC drill. And gradually all the time I put in working over those plain black shoes changed my attitude toward the entire shoe shining process. In a strange way, I even began to look forward to it. Somehow, someway, shining my shoes had been magically transformed from drudgery into a fundamentally relaxing process from which I derived no little satisfaction.
Now, when I begin the process of shining my dress shoes, I am no longer pissed off that I had to do it or impatient to get it over, as I once was. Strangely, it has become a pleasant and even soothing routine for me to take a couple ratty-looking, beat-up shoes and transform them into a highly polished and attractive pair. The ever so distinctive polish smell, the supple feel as the leather moves under the brush, the sound of the slapping strokes coupled with the physical rhythm all have a powerful and special appeal that is now part of me.
Life is indeed wonderful and amazing.

Friday, May 6, 2011

How Florida Was Developed 03 — EATING FLORIDA

ED BALL—Exemplar of Modern Florida Development

In other circumstances it might have been a tremendous uphill struggle to come up with a person to rival Henry Flagler as THE Florida entrepreneur of modern times. But life is stranger than fiction in so many ways.
Some of the most intriguing accounts dealing with Florida’s modern history are derived from the life of Ed Ball, a distant relative of George Washington. Ball, a high school dropout from Ball’s Neck, Virginia, was part of a family of genteel southerners rendered dirt poor, like thousands of others, by the Civil War. But Ed was clearly different from the herd and that difference was more than the king-sized chip he carried on his shoulder throughout his long life.
A tough banty-rooster who asked no quarter and gave none in return, Ball was driven to prove his abilities to the world. His goal was to succeed no matter what obstacles were in his path. Before his sister married well and helped her brother start his relentless climb up the ladder, Ball was a very successful though dissatisfied salesman of law books, office furniture, cash registers, and then automobiles. Despite making a great deal more money than most above-average salesmen, Ball was regarded by his cultured and wealthy friends simply as an upstart, near-do-well drummer straining and striving to improve his lot vis-à-vis his social superiors. Incidentally, for those readers unfamiliar with the economic history of the early 20th Century, the word ‘drummer’ was derived from drum-shaped containers in which commercial goods were transported across country by rail and ship and indicated a salesman of lower- to middle-class standing. Definitely Ball was below the salt.
After his sister, Jessie, had the astounding luck to marry Alfred I. duPont, one of the wealthiest and most successful industrialists in the country, Ball recognized his golden opportunity. He badgered Jessie without ceasing until she persuaded her new husband to appoint Ed his business manager. As fate would have it, the marriage itself turned out to not have been made in heaven but the relationship between duPont and Ed Ball was. At the time, duPont was one of the largest stockholders in both DuPont Chemicals and General Motors. And it turned out Ed Ball had a true genius for making money. DuPont and Ball, recognizing tremendous opportunities in the Florida real estate crash of 1926 and also at the beginning of the Depression, began picking up large chunks of property dirt cheap, buying farms, woodlands, railroads, and one bank after another.
As an indication of the enormous pile of money duPont controlled, during the Crash of 1926 he started construction of his new home, Epping Forest, on a 58-acre estate south of Jacksonville,. The mansion itself, with approximately 15,000 square feet, contained 25 grand rooms and was a unique mixture of Gothic, Mediterranean Revival, and Baroque architectural styles. Today, it has been completely restored and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Oh, yes, how could I neglect to tell you that it is now owned by and home to the Epping Forest Yacht Club. And Jeeves, high tea and biscuits will be served at 4:00. Promptly. After we return from the regatta.
From the 1920s through the tumultuous 1930s, Ball and duPont literally assembled a financial empire, starting in the Panhandle and northern Florida and then extending into the main part of the State. In one justly famous deal, Ball optioned over 430,000 acres in the Panhandle for a song. Shortly before he either had to renew the option or buy the land Ball was able to sell 190,000 acres to the federal government for Apalachicola National Forest through his many Washington political contacts. The money he received from the government paid for the entire 430,000 acres with $70,000 left over as his immediate profit. Not to mention the remaining 240,000 acres, which he eventually turned to considerable economic advantage. Quite a nifty piece of economic legerdemain during the Great Depression.
Upon Alfred’s death, Ball became sole Trustee of the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust. He quickly turned the Trust into Florida’s largest landowner, largest banker, largest railroad, and largest tax payer. In the process, good old Ed ran duPont’s original $40 million estate (that was its Depression-day value) up to an estimated $2 billion. In this extraordinary run, which stretched to 1981, Ball acquired 31 banks, owned almost two million acres of Florida land, bought Flagler’s Florida East Coast Railroad when it went bankrupt in the mid-1930s, two sugar refineries, the St. Joe Paper Company, and 23 cardboard box plants in the U.S. and Europe. The astounding growth of the duPont Trust under Ed Ball’s management ranks as one of the most remarkable feats in the financial history of the United States and dominated the economic development of Florida, then and now.
Ball, who proved himself a financial wizard in a viciously competitive circle of like-minded men, was if anything even more skilled at putting solid political deals together with politicians on both sides of the aisle. Throughout his long life Ball was vilified by his opponents, with more truth than he would ever admit, as a racist, union-busting, rabid anti-Communist whose only concern in life was making more money. Ball’s favorite toast was “Confusion to the enemy.” And everyone who wasn't an active friend was his enemy. At one time he even suggested to newspaper reporters in a public comment that the then governor of Florida, who happened to disagree with him about a political matter, was on an LSD trip. And when President Kennedy called the principals in the long-lasting railroad strike to a meeting in Washington because of the strike’s deleterious effects on NASA’s space program at Cape Canaveral, Ball refused to attend, telling reporters that he couldn't accommodate the President because he had a dental appointment that day. Today, wealth, power, and arrogance like that are difficult to imagine only if you've never heard of Donald Trump.
Ball, who died  in 1981 at the age of 93 as one of the richest men in the country, had over the years acquired a richly deserved reputation as a mean-spirited and cantankerous old man. As an example, in 1970, after the death of his sister, Jessie, who was the sole beneficiary of the Alfred I. duPont Trust, two of the Trust’s trustees, including duPont’s grandson, Alfred Dent, tried to have the Trust’s investments re-structured to comply with duPont’s will. Alfred duPont had stipulated that, on his wife’s death, the income derived from the Estate would go to the crippled children and elderly poor of the State of Delaware. Ball proved exactly how deserved was his reputation for meanness by suing to void that provision of his brother-in-law’s will and by continuing to accrue assets rather than pay out benefits to the elderly poor and crippled children of Delaware. Ball made Ebenezer Scrooge at his worst appear kindly and generous.
Not once in all his long life was Ed Ball accused of being a nice guy. But what he accomplished can’t be denied no matter how much you detest his mean-spirited and self-aggrandizing actions. As a direct result of his personal battle to dominate the State financially he dragged Florida into the present simply by outsmarting and crushing the opposition. Like him or despise him, most objective observers would acknowledge that his reputation as the leading entrepreneur of modern Florida is a reflection of economic reality.

I’m Old and Glad

           This message is pointedly directed at the seniors out there, though the young ones can listen quietly while I rant.
Want to feel happy, and I mean really really happy, for once that you’re an old fart and can see your demise looming in the not so distant future? Whoa, that’s a switch. To get that happy days infusion all you have to do is read the United Nations report on world population prospects that was released on May 4 (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm). It projects that global population, instead of stabilizing at 9.3 billion by 2050, will keep increasing, and may even hit 10.1 billion by 2100.
The good news is we old farts won’t be around to see the shit hit that particular fan. And by shit I mean globally insufficient water, food scarcity and rising prices, energy and other natural resource shortages, continued habitat destruction, species going extinct at accelerated rates, oceans in steep decline, increased desertification, and accelerated climate change, among many others.
Naturally, I should try to control my gloating over the inevitability of not being alive to experience those worst of times but young people love to rub the glory of their youth in the wrinkled faces of their elders so evening up the score doesn’t seem overly rude. If anyone out there can’t see the handwriting on the wall they are blind, deaf, and plenty dumb (time to invoke my Rule of 85).
It should come as no surprise that billions in India and China and other developing nations want to increase their already rising standards of living so they can have high-consumption lifestyles like Western Europeans or even like the fat and saucy Americans. And why the hell wouldn't they? Who wants to pedal a cycle rickshaw for a few rupees if you can be a software engineer and earn thousands? Who wants to eat brown rice when well-marbled steak smothered in mushrooms, onions, and asparagus covered with hollandaise sauce is available? Really. Anyone out there think about what happens to sustainable (but poorly managed) and non-sustainable natural resources when billions more people demand high-consumption lifestyles. Can you spell F-I-N-I-T-E? If so, can you spell C-O-L-L-A-P-S-E? A tip of the hat to Jared Diamond.
The problem is we Americans got it good and we aren’t about to give it up. No siree, Bob. So, let’s keep those defense expenditures sky high just in case we need to kick some foreign ass over who gets the shrinking resources.
All I can say is thank God I’m going to miss all that by dying well before 2050. If I’m lucky, at my current age of 68 and with a normal life expectancy of 76 years for males, statistically, I should expect to kick off somewhere around 2019 or 2020. Which means I shouldn’t experience any change whatsoever in my decadent lifestyle, unless Social Security and Medicare blows up in our faces because of the meddling of idiot Republicans. So, I expect to die with a smile on my face, having lived a life of material comfort envied by billions.
It’s really too bad about those poor little bastards in the developing world who face calorie, protein, and vitamin deficiencies and insufficient drinking water. Maybe they should just move somewhere nicer, like the French Riviera. Hey, it could happen.
Say, make mine a jumbo chocolate milkshake with extra whipped cream, a third of a pound Angus cheddar cheese burger with double bacon and lots of onion. And supersize those fries will you? Christ, I love being an old fart American.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

How Florida Was Developed 02 — EATING FLORIDA


HENRY MORRISON FLAGLER — Founder of Modern Florida

Henry M. Flagler, one of the world’s wealthiest men at the time of his death, was the business partner of John D. Rockefeller. Who publicly referred to Flagler as “the brains behind the Standard Oil Company.” Flagler had shown an early talent for business, leaving home at the tender age of fifteen to seek his fortune. During the Civil War, he did just that, making it big by supplying salt to the Union Army. Only to bite the bitter bankruptcy bullet when prices plummeted and the market collapsed as the armies returned home in 1865. Flagler, like many good capitalists throughout the North, had counted on the War continuing for at least another year or two and was unprepared for the financial crash that followed victory.
In 1867, John D. Rockefeller, a friend and business associate in the grain business (actually Flagler had hired him earlier as a commissioned grain broker), came to Flagler with an incredible proposition. He wanted to borrow the then princely sum of $100,000 to capitalize his new, successful but highly speculative business venture in petroleum refining and marketing. Thinking Rockefeller was on to a very good idea, Flagler referred him to his half-brother, Daniel Morrison Harkness (the offspring of Henry’s mother and her second husband), who was a major force behind the very prosperous Harkness family’s financial investments.
Dan’s older half-brother, Stephen Harkness (who was also Flagler’s half-cousin and who had made a serious fortune in alcohol distilling/sales through illegal manipulation and collusion with Senator John Sherman, the brother of General William Tecumseh Sherman), agreed to fund the proposal. But only if Flagler, who just so happened to be married to his sister, Mary Harkness — unrelated by blood to Flagler; yeah, it was a complicated family — would become Rockefeller’s partner and in complete control of the Harkness investment. After all, somebody had to protect the family’s financial interests.
In 1868, at age 37, with support from Stephen Harkness and acting as the family’s agent, Flagler joined with John Rockefeller and Samuel Andrews to form the Rockefeller, Andrews and Flagler Oil Refinery. By 1869 the company had grown so quickly it dominated the oil refining market in Cleveland. The prospect of rapid growth, like the horrid smells emanating from the industrial refineries, had thickened the air with incredible promise. On January 10, 1870, the partnership evolved into a joint-stock corporation that took the name, Standard Oil.
By 1872 Standard Oil dominated the American oil refining industry, producing 10,000 barrels per day. Five years later, when Standard Oil was regarded as the world’s largest and richest industrial company, it moved its headquarters from Cleveland to New York City. And the Flaglers moved to their new home on Fifth Avenue. It was the Big Time for Rockefeller and for Henry.
The collaboration between Rockefeller and Flagler became what was likely the greatest money-making venture in the history of capitalism. Many years later, when asked if he had conceived the idea of the now infamous and pilloried Standard Oil Trust, a board of trustees who would operate across international boundaries and grow the company almost without limits until it controlled over 90 percent of the world’s oil refining and marketing capacity, Rockefeller answered, “No, sir. I wish I’d had the brains to think of it. It was Henry M. Flagler.”
Flagler was already a very, very rich man by the mid-1870s. His wealth came the old fashioned way. He acquired it as a direct result of devising and implementing a ruthless strategy of devouring competing refineries or driving them out of business. And thus was the world’s first monopoly created.
In 1876, Flagler, seeking a winter climate healthier than New York City for his ailing wife, Mary, took his family to Florida. The journey from New York to Savannah by rail was uneventful. But the rail line terminated in that South Carolina port. The connecting steamboat trip to St. Augustine took an uncomfortable sixteen hours. The Flaglers found St. Augustine to be small, unattractive, and provincial beyond relief. Henry in particular took an instant dislike to the City, resolving never to return.
Over the next several years Flagler offered to send his chronically ill wife and children south for the winter but she always refused, not wanting to be separated from him, even for a short few months. Despite the specter of her rapidly failing health, Flagler was too enthralled with the prospect of controlling the world’s oil market to take time to re-visit Florida. Or to pay more than passing attention to his wife’s increasingly severe health problems.
In 1882, a year after his wife’s death from pneumonia, for reasons that were never revealed, Flagler returned to St. Augustine and found the City greatly changed. Although it was far from the elegant resorts to which he was accustomed, the City’s January climate was nothing short of wonderful and its accommodations were much more refined than he remembered.
He returned in 1883 with a new wife, Ida Alice Shourds, who had been one of his first wife’s nurses, and decided to build the Ponce de León Hotel, a posh new facility catering to wealthy Easterners who, like himself, were desperate for a fair haven in winter. It would be the first large-scale building in Florida inspired by the so-called “Spanish style” adapted by John Carrere and Thomas Hastings, the young New York architects chosen by Flagler. Actually their design tastefully combined Spanish, Moorish and Italian Renaissance architectural traditions rather than only Spanish.
Within a month after breaking ground on the hotel, Flagler and several business partners bought the Jacksonville, St. Augustine, and Halifax River Railway, a short-line road with connections to the rail hub in Savannah. At that same time he started construction on another hotel in St. Augustine, the Alcazar, whose design was inspired by the Moorish influenced castellated towers and red tile roofs of the Alcazar Palace in Seville.
Determined to make money on his hotel investments by insuring a steady occupancy, Flagler decided to take the reins in his hands and hustle customers directly to his resorts. He bought two other short-lines and extended track south to Daytona Beach, renaming the line the Florida East Coast Railway. He was well on his way to becoming one of the most important entrepreneurs in Florida history.
Disappointed with the weather in St. Augustine, especially after the City suffered several hard freezes in the late 1880s and early 1890s, Flagler decided to move his operations to a location with a more reliable winter climate. Sometime in 1889 he sailed his yacht south along the Florida coast and came across a long, slender barrier island that was reported to have exceptionally mild winters. The Gulf Stream curved closer to the shore at that point than at any other location in the country. Bordered on one side by the Atlantic and on the other by Lake Worth, a navigable inlet of great beauty, the island was continually cooled by sea breezes and was further distinguished by a remarkable stand of coconut palms. Small wonder Henry fell in love with it.
In 1892, relying on his experience at The Standard Oil Company, that he who controls the production, sale, and transportation of a product in demand controls the market, Flagler sought and received an official charter to extend the rail line from Daytona to Miami. The irresistible financial plum in this deal was a generous gift from the State of 8,000 acres of land per each mile of track laid. In all, the land granted to Flagler from the State added up to 2.04 million acres. Seriously. Talk about a world-class steal. Ah, that’s the State of Florida for you, always generous with the already wealthy. He then began developing a huge new resort on the sheltered side of his favorite barrier island, between Lake Worth and the Atlantic, a resort designed for the richest of the rich that came to be known as Palm Beach.
As track was being laid to reach his new city, Flagler broke ground on one of the largest and most luxurious hotels in the world, the six-story Royal Poinciana. The hotel opened in Palm Beach in 1894 with 1,150 rooms, electricity, elevators, private bathrooms, a potential occupancy of 2,000, and seven miles of corridor. Suites cost $100 per day, a truly incredible sum in those pre-inflation days. In the summer of 1895, Flagler began work on another hotel on the Atlantic shore of the island. That hotel, which later became known as the Breakers, is the only one of his hotels that remains a working establishment today. These two ventures cost Flagler well over $4 million (which today would be worth more than $106 million).
At the same time, Henry was building an estate for a third wife who was considerably younger than he. Whitehall, an enormous Classical Revival mansion in the heart of Palm Beach, was literally filled with tons of the most expensive Italian marble. Not to risk ostentatiousness, the mansion was decorated everywhere with gilded ornamentation, to the staggering tune of $2.5 million, which would be worth slightly more than $66 million today. Determined not to be outdone by his future neighbors, Flagler then filled Whitehall with over a million dollars of the finest furniture the world had to offer. To put this enormous pile of money in historical perspective, in those times a skilled worker earned about $1.50 a day or even slightly less and upper management executives were making about $6,500 a year. Think about that and a $3.5 million house for a moment. In a wonderfully incisive book, Theory of the Leisure Class, the great and now largely forgotten sociologist-economist-satirist Thorstein Veblen coined a phrase about people like Flagler that said it all: Conspicuous Consumption.
All that investment, plus Flagler’s railroads, added up to a mountain of serious money. But you have to understand that Flagler was rich beyond our imagination. He was so wealthy that near the end of his life he was drawing over two million dollars income a year from his Standard Oil holdings alone, in the days before inflation and income tax. Remember, that $2 million did not include a single penny from his enormously profitable Florida holdings or from his other stocks and bonds.
Incidentally, Henry’s Florida earnings are very difficult to estimate today because he incorporated over a dozen independent firms: railroads, hotels, land development, car ferries, electrical utilities, water companies, etc. Those separate, stand-alone enterprises were put in place for one purpose only: to insolate Flagler’s enormous Standard Oil holdings from potentially damaging lawsuits. Having once gone bankrupt as a young man, Henry had become a very crafty businessman. In every way imaginable.
When Flagler extended the Florida East Coast Railway to Miami he received 100,000 acres of land with prime agricultural potential from the State. He also was given, at no cost to him, land in Miami from local landowners anxious to profit from a railhead in their then squalid little community (population of 1,680 in 1900). Flagler really possessed the golden touch, making money everywhere he turned, from the State, from eager investors in his ideas, from the consuming public, and even from fellow property owners.
After reaching Miami and building the Royal Palm Hotel, Flagler looked south and saw Cuba. Many thought his extension of the Florida East Coast Railway to Key West was but the first part of a grand strategy to bring Havana within his entrepreneurial grasp. Alas, it was not to be. On March 15, 1913, Flagler fell down a flight of marble stairs at Whitehall and suffered a broken hip and other serious complications. His only son, Harry Harkness Flagler, who hadn’t seen his father for nearly 20 years and had never met his step mother, eventually agreed to travel from New York to be at his bedside. But his father, drugged to the max, never recognized his estranged son and died on May 20. He is buried alongside his daughter, Jennie Louise, and first wife, Mary Harkness, in a mausoleum in the St. Augustine Presbyterian Church, a church he built and donated to its members. With his railroad, hotels, and land holdings extending from St. Augustine to Key West, Flagler ushered the State into the modern triumvirate age of tourists, land development, and agriculture. An age Florida has yet to exit.
Henry Morrison Flagler created modern Florida in many ways. When he first became involved in the late 1870s, not one city in the State had a population exceeding 10,000. What Flagler did was to set the stage. He established the critical infrastructure and the international focus that changed the State for all time. He proved once and for all time that a man with money, vision, and a single-minded drive to succeed could make a fortune by wisely investing in Florida real estate.
Of course, Henry Flagler was a far more complex historical character than how much money he made or how much Florida real estate he developed, directly or indirectly. Like most of us mere mortals, his personal life was riddled with quite a number of very human foibles. Money, despite what we impecunious folk like to think, doesn’t protect you from the slings and arrows of life. So, let’s turn the coin over to glance briefly at the other side and examine Flagler’s feet of clay.
As mentioned above, Henry M. was much too busy building Standard Oil into the world’s largest corporation to take his invalid first wife out of New York during the severe winters. It is not an exaggeration to say he willfully ignored her physician’s warning that a change of climate was vital to her well-being. The problem was he was having way too much fun building the world’s greatest industrial empire to tend to his ailing wife. Almost certainly one result of Flagler’s inattention was Mary Harkness Flagler’s early demise from a chronic bronchitis that graduated to full fledged pneumonia. And, during the time his wife was most ill, Henry was not bent over his desk in Manhattan working late at the office but was spending evenings and weekends dallying about New York with Helen Long Foote, the lovely wife of C. W. Foote of Syracuse.
Not long after Mary’s death, Henry was named a correspondent in the nasty Foote divorce proceedings. Documents produced in Court demonstrated that Flagler had presented the beautiful Helen with munificent gifts, not the least of which were a fashionable townhouse on East Fifty-Seventh Street in Manhattan and Standard Oil Company stock valued at over $400,000. Not a shabby price to pay for the favors of an attractive and willing woman, married or not. It could be he was crying over spilt milk, but poor C. W. angrily stated in a formal deposition that his wife served as Flagler’s mistress for over a year. Perhaps the recurrent black-dog depression that hounded Flagler mercilessly in his declining years, leaving him weeping and emotionally incapacitated for weeks on end, was related to his unconscionable treatment of his first wife. After all, Mary Harkness was a woman who loved him so deeply and unselfishly that she refused to save her own life by moving to a location with a warmer winter climate.
When Henry’s second wife (who had been his first wife’s nurse and who had had an ongoing affair with Henry while Mary was alive) became mentally ill, but not too far gone to realize he was running around with other women, he was in a quandary. The State of New York, then his legal residence, did not recognize insanity as grounds for divorce. No problem. Henry switched his legal residence to Florida and arranged for several key members of the legislature, inspired by campaign contributions totaling $150,000 (worth about $3 million today), to sponsor a bill making insanity grounds for divorce in the Sunshine State. Several months after the legislation passed, Henry was divorced and re-married. The public outcry over that all too obvious political favoritism was so great the statute was repealed several years later. But Henry had accomplished his purpose well before that time.
Henry’s only son, Henry Harkness Flagler, the youngest child of his first marriage, proved singularly uninterested in running his father’s businesses in Florida. After two years laboring at Henry’s grindstone in Palm Beach, Harry permanently abandoned the Sunshine State for New York City. There he married Anna Louise Lamont, heiress of wealthy financier Charles Lamont, and became a devotee and great benefactor of the arts. Harry had basically been estranged from his father for nearly 20 years when Henry died. It was only after his father’s death that Harry blossomed into his own man, becoming one of the most influential leaders of the New York musical world and the principal financial supporter of the Symphony Society and the Philharmonic-Symphony Society.
Uncomfortable as the idea might make us, it could be said that it was Henry Flagler’s cold, distant, manipulative, greedy, and narcissistic nature that enabled him to become the “Father” of modern Florida. Certainly, a well-balanced, sensitive, caring, altruistic individual would have had little motivation to drive him toward the same land development and moneymaking goals that drove Henry. Perhaps the State of Florida is lucky to have had a Henry Flagler to drag it kicking and screaming into the Modern Age. Maybe Karl Marx was right when he coined the idea of the Historical Imperative. Without doubt, few other men could have done half as much in twice the time as Flagler. Having said all that, I have always wondered what Florida would look like today if Henry had never returned to St. Augustine after his first wife’s death.

How Florida Was Developed 01 — EATING FLORIDA

If you’re not a devoted history buff, you might be slightly confused or, heaven forbid, even bored by the seemingly endless march of peoples from widely differing backgrounds across the early Florida landscape. Native Americans of various tribal identities. Spanish. English. French. Blacks from the west coast of Africa as slaves and, far less frequently, as free men and women. And, of course, we can’t forget all those Americans who have been running the show since.
But exactly how did these explorers, soldiers, pioneers, and settlers transform the Florida environments of those times long past to what we have before us today? After all, Miami, Palm Beach, Naples, Tampa, Gainesville, Tallahassee, and all the other bustling urban centers throughout the State didn’t just spring from the ground fully formed. Perhaps the best demonstration of how and why the State got to the condition it is in today is to examine the actions of three key players who came to Florida and changed it forever.

HAMILTON DISSTON — FLORIDA LAND BARON NONPAREIL

When Florida joined the Union in 1845, it received title to somewhere between 14 million and 22 million acres of “swamp and overflow lands” that were deemed unfit for cultivation by the Federal government. The State, suffering a cash flow bind in its early operations, since its ability to collect taxes was limited, put up much of that land as collateral for bonds offered by the first railroads and canal companies. The State’s intention was to encourage widespread settlement and cultivation. And thereafter to impose and collect taxes that would end the State’s cash flow problems. Ah, sweet dreams.
After the Civil War, the penniless railroads defaulted on their loans and, since the State was unable to pay its obligations in U.S. dollars, the bond holders claimed the land. The State fought an increasingly desperate holding action in court for over a decade seeking to be relieved of its obligation to pay the bond holders. No luck.
Then, in 1881, on the verge of legal defeat and the financial disaster of bankruptcy, Governor William Bloxham struck an incredible deal with Hamilton Disston, a wealthy northern industrialist who was the principal heir to the Philadelphia Keystone Saw fortune. Disston and various financial partners agreed to drain 12,000,000 acres of south Florida wetlands in exchange for clear title to half of those acres. Their assignment was to lower the level of Lake Okeechobee, deepen and straighten the Kissimmee River, and connect the St. Lucie River on the Atlantic coast with the Caloosahatchee River on the Gulf through Lake Okeechobee. A truly Heraclean task that was not to be achieved until the 1970s.
Disston, who holds the unenviable title of “Father” of large-scale Florida development schemes, was an adventurous free-spirited sort. As an impetuous young blade he tried twice to enlist as a soldier in the Civil War. Only to suffer the ignominy of being dragged home by his ear by an irate and not so understanding father. Who knew how to make the enlistment board turn a blind eye to Ham’s entreaties. The boy had not yet learned that money and political power had definite privileges. Privileges that precluded exposing his tender body on the battlefield to mini-balls, cannon shot or, much worse, dysentery.
Years later, the mature Hamilton was physically introduced to Florida by General Henry S. Sanford, a hunting and fishing buddy cut from the same adventurous cloth. Sanford persuaded Disston to set his sights on building communities centered around farms in fertile south Florida. The farm families would then become consumers of goods and services offered by none other than Disston himself.
In essence, the young industrialist’s intention was to establish a self-perpetuating profit cycle. Drained land = farms = markets = settlements = profits = more drained land and on and on. You can see how the cycle was supposed to work. It didn’t hurt that good old Ham was primed for opportunity, bound and determined to create a financial entity of his own, separate from the Disston family fortune. It was time for him to stand up and be counted. He had his own destiny to create and didn’t need to ride Daddy’s coattails. No sir!
By January 1882, with Governor Bloxham’s first offer of Florida land flushed down the toilet by unforeseen legal complications, the by then eager Ham agreed to purchase four million acres, or 6,250 square miles of real estate, from the Florida Internal Improvement Fund for a whopping $1,000,000 (which in today’s dollars was worth from about $29 million in terms of general purchasing power to $145 million in terms of labor value). Making him America’s largest land owner. How sweet it was.
Already assured by his friend and fellow Florida adventurer, General Sanford, that a huge fortune could be made once the land was dry, Disston formed the Okeechobee Land Company to dredge canals, drain the Everglades and reclaim the land for farming. Once drained, Florida would become as fat and fertile as the south of France, only with a more reliable climate. And oh so profitable. The hook was firmly set in Ham’s eager jaw. He was ready to put the dredges to work.
Not one to wait until the ink was dry on his contract with the State, or even for his lands to be surveyed and described so he knew exactly what he bought, or where it was located, Disston started digging immediately. Two separate dredging parties began simultaneously. One headed south from the origin of the Kissimmee River and the other moved east from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Ft. Myers. “We’ll meet in the middle of Lake Okeechobee, boys” must have been his rallying cry to the troops.
By late 1882, Disston’s dream seemed to teeter on the edge of reality. He ran a steamboat from Ft. Myers all the way up the Caloosahatchee into Lake Okeechobee and then north up the Kissimmee for 92 more miles. He was going like a house on fire. As an aside, it is an extraordinary but truly depressing reality that in the early 1880s, fully 60 percent of the State of Florida was owned by five railroads, one drainage company, and none other than Hamilton Disston, who held the largest chunk in his eager hands.
Disston’s next bold step was to open Florida land sales offices in every major U.S. city and even in Europe, selling land for farms large and small. As well as building lots for more urbanized settlements. He sponsored experimental farms and agricultural processing plants, like his $1 million sugar refinery in St. Cloud that was surrounded by thousands of acres of sugarcane. A crop he was told (correctly as it turned out) would re-seed itself naturally, a benefit of mild, subtropical winters. And, mistakenly believing Tarpon Springs was a sport fishing paradise, Ham established as a resort there for his rich buddies. Only to learn that tarpon domiciled somewhere far to the south. But it didn’t appear to bother him. He had money to burn. Or so it seemed at the time.
Although he was a tremendously energetic pioneer in creative financing schemes, the economic crash of 1893 ruined a badly over-extended Disston. At the age of fifty, faced with bankruptcy and personal humiliation, the proud Disston put a pistol to his head and killed himself in the bathtub of his Philadelphia mansion. Shades of Richard Cory. Here’s the poem.

Richard Cory

Whenever Richard Cory went down town,
We people on the pavement looked at him:
He was a gentleman from sole to crown,
Clean favored, and imperially slim.
And he was always quietly arrayed,
And he was always human when he talked;
But still he fluttered pulses when he said,
“Good-morning,” and he glittered when he walked.

And he was rich - yes, richer than a king -
And admirably schooled in every grace;
In fine we thought that he was everything
To make us wish that we were in his place.

So on we worked, and waited for the light,
And went without the meat, and cursed the bread;
And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,
Went home and put a bullet through his head.

— Edwin Arlington Robinson —

Don’t you just love poetry? It’s so sweet and genteel.
It is highly likely that, given that the times made merciless exploitation of the land an accepted and approved activity, most if not all of those horrific adverse environmental effects would have occurred with or without Hamilton Disston. However, fair or not, poor Ham stands at the head of a long but infamous line of environmental vandals, thieves, and con artists. His example inspired hundreds of lesser men and certainly a select few more effective ones as well. All of whom were convinced that with a little luck they would avoid Disston’s fate and hit the jackpot big time.
Buying Florida land cheap and selling it to gullible suckers for stupendous profits became a highly desirable and sought after way of life. And would change the Florida landscape far into the future.

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Pamplin Avenue 05

When I moved up to first grade, Jack and I used to walk to and from school together, a distance of five fairly short blocks. On most occasions one or more of our neighborhood friends accompanied us. On a particular day I will never forget, Jack, our neighbor Tom O., and I were walking home on Florissant Avenue not far from Riverview Boulevard. I spotted a $5.00 bill on the sidewalk in front of a restaurant and yelled in typical kid fashion, “Dibs on the money!” And sprinted for it.
Tom, two years older and a step or two faster, overtook me and was just about to snatch it up when I jumped on his back, knocking him to the ground, his outstretched hand only inches from the treasure. At that critical moment, Jack scooped up the $5.00 and the two of us took off running, congratulating ourselves on working as a team, leaving poor Tom lying on the sidewalk in tears. When Dad came home we gave the bill to him and he gave us each $2.50.
Despite Tom’s cry-babying around the neighborhood about how we cheated him, we gave him not one red cent. “Finders keepers, losers weepers” was the tough rule all of us kids lived by back then. We figured it was too bad if his parents didn’t understand. Regardless of his loud belly-aching about how unfair we were, Tom knew that if it had been he who had grabbed the money there would have been no thought of his splitting it with Jack and me. Such unrepentant, unchristian savages were we.

Pamplin Avenue 04

Many sweet, golden images of childhood I can never forget, especially the huge, to my eyes, but gentle horses that pulled the dairy delivery wagons down Pamplin Avenue, knowing each stop without being prompted by the driver. The milkman would carry the bottles to the side doors of each house and the horse would calmly walk to the next stop. We thought that was a near miraculous ability. It reinforced our belief that animals were smart. And who could forget the delicious slivers of ice we begged from the milkman in the hot months of summer.
I still remember the day I turned five and learned to ride a two-wheeler. On my first downhill run, despite my father’s heroic efforts, I lost my balance, crashing headlong into one of those old cast-iron lampposts and knocked a big hole in its base, destroying the front wheel of the bike in the process.
Several months later I started going to kindergarten at Nativity Grade School and discovering girls. “Gels,” as I first called those strange but incredibly and endlessly fascinating creatures. Being from an all male household (of course Mother did not count in that calculus) and a neighborhood largely absent of young females definitely had its drawbacks.
At the end of one memorable day in kindergarten I felt a strong urge to take a dump. But I fought it off. Even then I hated to drop a load anywhere except in the security of my home.
An innocent little popcorn fart or three must have slipped out because the nun quickly came sniffing around my end of the play table.
“Does someone have to go to the bathroom?” she asked, in that dreaded voice of someone with a direct connection to the One Who Knows All. We shook our heads, even me who knew better. One blond little girl at our play table frowned at me with pursed lips; I knew my secret would not long be kept.
Minutes later the nun came cruising by again, nose working overtime. In her role as Fart Inspector General she looked me directly in the eye and asked, “Bobby, do you have to go to the bathroom?” Out of the corner of my eye I saw the tattler nodding her pig-tailed head and pointing her finger at me.
“No, S’ster,” I lied, my heart in my mouth.
A few minutes later the noon bell rang and class was dismissed. After arriving home I immediately dashed for the bathroom and, with a mighty sigh of relief, ripped my pants off, climbed on the pot, and did the dirty deed. To my absolute horror, at that very instant the telephone in the hallway rang. My heart leapt into my throat. It had to be the nun, I thought in panic, checking up on me. Seeing if I had lied and was grunting on the toilet after all.
“Mom,” I shrieked. “If that’s Sister Josepha don’t tell her I’m in the bathroom.”
Naturally, it wasn’t the nun. But the story became an instantaneous addition to our family folklore.

Tribute to an Unforgettable Garbage Man; Pamplin Avenue 03



The alley behind our house in North St. Louis was used primarily as a means of accessing garages and as a service corridor to collect trash and garbage. One early summer morning shortly after turning five years old, I was feeling particularly full of the old Nick, as my grandmother would say, and decided to give Jack, my older and much wiser brother, a demonstration of my stout-hearted courage. As the black men walked down the alley alongside the enormous garbage truck I boldly strutted to the rear fence and, in the brave voice of a little boy secure in his own back yard, called the nearest black man an offensive name I had heard from play-mates in the neighborhood, “Hey, you jigaboo.”
Without missing a beat the man gave me a hard look, slowly pulled an object from his front pocket, and held it up. He pressed a button and as if by magic a long, slim, shiny blade seemed to leap from nowhere. His grin was pure malice as he put the knife to his throat and pretended to cut from ear to ear.
Jack, my previously giggling witness, and I slowly backed toward the now too distant house, terrified. The black man easily vaulted the low fence and reached out as if to grab us. We bolted for the house, screaming at the top of our lungs as if a dozen fire-breathing dragons were in hot pursuit. Up the porch we flew, running through the house, down the basement stairs, screaming all the way, until we squeezed behind the huge octopus-like furnace in a space so tight no adult-sized person could possibly fit, quivering in silent terror lest he find us and slit our soft, white throats.
Even when Mom came downstairs and finally figured out where we were hiding, we refused to obey her order to come out. We were too scared and balked at leaving our safe haven. Not until she went outside and checked the alley and assured us that the garbage men were long gone.
We were never punished for that misadventure. Just got serious lectures from both parents on treating people the way we wanted to be treated. In my mind, I have thanked on countless occasions the nameless but never forgotten black man for teaching a stupid little white boy a lifetime lesson in behavior.
A couple years before her death Mom and I laughed almost to the point of wetting our pants, remembering that story. She and Dad had discussed calling the City’s Sanitation Department and telling them what had happened. Not to cause trouble but as a way of thanking the man for teaching Jack and I an invaluable lesson in racial sensitivity. In the end, they decided that the man would likely be punished or fired by a supervisor without a sense of humor or an ounce of social conscience. So, they let it slide. But neither my brother nor I ever forgot that lesson or the nameless black sanitation worker who taught it.

Pamplin Avenue 02

Once we get past infancy and into early childhood I’m into territory that’s increasingly familiar. One incident is so fresh in my mind it is as if it happened only a few years ago. Mom and Dad promised Jack a Mickey Mouse watch if he learned to tell time before his fifth birthday, which was then about a month away. Of course he jumped on what he recognized as a golden opportunity, Mickey Mouse watches being the cat’s ass of the day. I was also excited, thinking that that was a piece of cake. Even at a little more than three an a half years old I had the attitude that anything Jack could do I could do better. And a lot faster.
So, that very day, a Saturday as Mom and I remembered in a conversation sometime in the early 1980s, I started learning time on a large wooden play clock with movable hands (similar to today’s Playschool clock). Believe me, the look of scorn on Jack’s face is still fresh in my mind as I concentrated on memorizing the numbers and their respective positions. Incidentally, I was reading and counting by that time.
Early Sunday afternoon Mom and Dad began quizzing Jack to encourage him and determine his progress. After a few questions it was obvious he was headed in the right direction but didn’t quite have it down. Especially with the numbers indicated by the clock’s small hand. Naturally, after he finished I jumped up and boldly announced that I knew how to tell time and they should ask me. That claim was greeted by no little skepticism by my parents and outright daggers from my justly irritated older brother. But my mother persuaded Dad to relent, saying that I should be given a chance too.
They began with the easy part, moving the big hand for the hours. Those I knew perfectly, even when they jumped around the clock face trying to confuse me. Then they got tough, switching to the minute hand. What number is this? They would move the hand. What number is that? Again the hand would change. Every time I had the correct response.
My father, growing increasingly impatient, then had me do both together, hour hand and minute hand. He was determined to prove that I really didn’t know how to tell time. Even as a small child I realized my father was growing angrier and angrier at each correct answer I gave. I thought I must be doing something wrong. They asked me every combination they could but I had the right answer each time. Finally, they both had to admit that there could be no mistake. I certainly did know how to tell time.
About 40 some-odd years later Mom related that story to me, marveling that Dad was furious because he had to buy two watches and not one. Never once did he acknowledge that I had done something praiseworthy. On Jack’s fifth birthday he received the coveted Mickey Mouse watch. As I did on my fourth birthday a little over two months later. But even then, despite my joy, I knew our rewards were not quite the same. I certainly remember the confusion and bewilderment I felt, even as Dad was browbeating me for accurately telling time. It was an experience to be repeated many times in my life.

Pamplin Avenue 01

Perhaps my clearest early memory is of getting in trouble, with a capital T, not long after turning three. For me, the most fascinating thing the new house on Pamplin Avenue we had just moved into was the dirty clothes chute, located off the main hall, between the living room and our bedroom. The chute led from the first floor to the laundry area in the basement immediately below. The chute had a circular lid, vaguely similar in size and shape to a small toilet lid, that was hinged above the opening to the vertical shaft. Perhaps I was drawn to the chute because it was situated only a foot higher than my head. If I dragged a footstool over and stood on my tip-toes, I could look down the chute directly to the dirty clothes hamper in the basement. That view and its promise called to me.
One day, not long after we had settled into the routine of the new home, I stuck my head in the chute and declared out loud that I could slide all the way to the clothes hamper in the basement. I sought immediately to recruit my brother, Jack, in the scheme. Naturally, being 14 months older and therefore wiser, he disapproved of such craziness. But, seeing that I was willing to take all the risk, he said he would “watch” me do it. Although I do not remember all the details, I’m sure a little goading entered the equation in the form of, “Bet you won’t do it,” or “I dare you.” I’m certain he covered his ass eventually by saying, “You better not. Mom will be mad.” Magic words that simply spurred me on.
Pumped with excitement to the point of exploding, I ran downstairs and shoved a load of dirty towels that Mom was preparing to wash that day back into the hamper to cushion the fall. Although I may have been an adventurous three-year-old I wasn’t stupid.
I hurried upstairs, grabbed the footstool, and positioned it in front of the chute. After making sure Mom wasn’t in the immediate vicinity I boosted myself into the chute head first, with a little help from my previously reluctant brother. After balancing precariously for a couple seconds on the lip of the chute, I tipped forward and down I slid toward the basement, arms stretched out in front like Superman. And promptly got stuck.
At first I tried to wiggle loose and continue my journey downward, convinced I could do it. No luck, the chute was too tight. Even my skinny three-year-old body was too large for the opening. That’s when the very tight quarters started working against me. I did the unthinkable and called for help from Jack. He grabbed my feet and pulled. To no avail. Of course, he panicked immediately and started to wail out loud, which started me crying because it was pretty damned frightening in that dark chute.
That’s when Jack lost it altogether and began screaming hysterically for our mother. Who came running to find her eldest son standing in the hallway crying his eyes out. When she asked him what was wrong he pointed toward the dirty clothes chute and said, “Bobby’s stuck.” Not understanding what was going on she opened the lid and nearly collapsed when she saw my feet sticking up in the chute.
Poor Mom didn’t know what to do. She was worried that if she pulled too hard I might be injured by a sharp piece of metal inside the chute. She thought about calling the fire department but quickly dismissed that idea because by that time I was growing more and more frightened by the possibility of being stuck there permanently and began yelling my fool head off. She simply took the bull by the horns, so to speak, grabbed my ankles, and cautiously but firmly pulled. Up and out I came, no worse for the experience, other than quite a few tears.
After a minute or two of maternal reassurance, hugs, and careful inspection of all the body parts, her parental disciplinarian streak asserted itself. Mom turned me over her knee and gave me a well-deserved spanking on the butt. Then, she stood me upright, shook me once or twice and in a properly exasperated tone demanded, “When will you be good, Bobby? When?”
Through my tears I sniffed and, without hesitation, replied, “Tuesday.”
Years later Mom told me she had to walk away because she knew she was going to laugh and didn’t want me to be wrongly encouraged. After that, “Tuesday” became one of the stock answers to all sorts of questions in our family. And it always had the same connotation — never.

Introduction—EATING FLORIDA

Let’s start with an observation that’s both obvious and universally accepted. Over the past two hundred years the sustained consequences of population growth, migration, and technological innovation have changed the face of the Earth. It should be equally obvious that a great many of those changes have been extraordinary since they have improved the human condition in measurable ways. After all, how many of us would volunteer to return to the “Good Old Days” and experience surgical procedures without benefit of modern technology, including anesthetics or antibiotics? Or to experience life where thirty to forty percent of all children died before they reached age twelve and mothers regularly died giving birth, especially those poor women unfortunate enough to have had their children at hospitals teeming with septicemia and worse? Or to try to survive the four dreaded horsemen of the Apocalypse that ruled the Earth not that many hundreds of years ago?
My guess is that few of us would willingly forgo the many improvements brought to our daily lives by scientific and industrial innovations. After all, where would we be without modern food production, transportation systems, electrical generation, information and telecommunication systems, or even something as comforting but non-essential as central heating and air conditioning?
Then again, everyone not mentally challenged, comatose, or sealed in Saran Wrap knows that the Earth has been beat to shit by greedy, indifferent, or brain-dead people in ways too numerous to document in these few pages. But, have a little patience while I list a few choice examples. The majority of America’s first-growth forests have been gone for well over a hundred years. Open prairies are but faded memories as are the herds of buffalo that once darkened the Midwest and the Great Plains. Only a few sorry-ass remnants tantalize us with images of their former glory. Global warming, holes in the ozone layer, air and water pollution up the ying-yang, and cancer caused by environmental polluters are all too familiar topics. Remember Love Canal, PCBs, and mercury poisoning, among many others?
My point is simple. Although not all land-based change is negative or harmful, some is. The fact that humans have altered one ecosystem after another as they organized their lives and struggled to wrest a living from their surroundings is not an automatic and universal cause of breast-beating or weepy guilt trips. After all, animals alter their specific environments and indigenous people across the globe do the same and few would censure them for those life-giving behaviors.
What it comes down to is change is simply change. Things change, people change, and the Earth is changed as a result. Whether those changes are positive or negative depends on the specific social and environmental consequences of the action itself. And that brings us to my topic: the effects of wide-spread change caused by unsustainable growth pressure in locations with numerous delicate and sensitive environments. Which, in turn, leads us straight to Florida.
It’s one thing for people to read about the melting of some unpronounceable glacier in the heretofore frozen Antarctic and quite another to learn about the impending death of the Everglades as a natural system. The reasons for that interest are straightforward. First, what happens in America is usually regarded as more important to us because it’s our country. That may be parochial but so is life as lived. The result is that American urban and environmental issues have more immediacy in our lives. Which in my eyes is good and natural. That’s the way it should be. We’re territorial animals and this territory is ours. Second, many of us have been to Florida and relate, as visitors or residents, to its varied problems. Third, even if you haven’t been to the Sunshine State, you know at least a little about it from coverage by entertainment and news media and from reports of friends or relatives who have vacationed or lived there. Therefore, in ways significant as well as trivial, Florida is familiar to all of us and serves as an excellent example of how humans have changed their environments in the past 100 years.
Florida’s siren-songs are so sweetly intoxicating that they demand attention and pull people like iron filings to an electro-magnet. Sunshine that won’t quit. Clear waters, salt and fresh. Sugar-sand beaches to frolic in. Sub-tropical winters to die for, especially if you’re from Minnesota or, worse, from North Dakota, which so sucks the big one that every young person with a brain and access to transportation seems to be heading for some place a lot more exciting. And yes, we can’t forget Florida’s lack of income taxes so beloved by the Silver Panthers. Those narco-seductions, combined with the State’s almost pathological inability to control growth or to protect the environment in meaningful ways, have attracted migrants to Florida like the honey pots of yore drew greenbottle flies in thick clouds.
The inevitable result, in a State where environmental regulations have largely been honored by their lack of enforcement, is that over the past 150 years each succeeding wave of new residents has altered larger and larger chunks of the environment until little remains that even approaches ecosystems in a natural state. Today, no place in the State is what it was before development. Not Palm Beach. Not the Everglades. Not Key Marco. Not the Panhandle’s Emerald Coast. Not Tampa Bay or Miami-Dade. Nothing in the environment has been able to withstand the onslaught of people intent on grabbing a piece of the good life and to hell with worrying about what had to be done for them to get it.
Any number of intelligent Readers might demand indignantly: So what? Nothing in the U.S. is what it used to be. What’s the big damn deal? What makes Florida so all-fired important?
The answer is cutting-edge environmental decisions are being made in Florida as you read this page. The pace, scale, and intensity of change in fragile and sensitive environments is what separates Florida from Wisconsin, Idaho, New York, or Texas. Of course, environments across the U.S. have been and continue today to be altered by human activities. However, few states have experienced the unrelenting and sustained assault that has transformed Florida environments from natural conditions into sterile cultural landscapes in so short a time. Think of the implications of the historical fact that in 1900 1,681 people were living in Miami. That environmental assault began even before the ink was dry on its Statehood papers in the mid-1840s and is still raging out of control. In addition, no where in the world can ecosystems like the Everglades or the Fakahatchee Strand be found. Nowhere. Not just in the U.S., anywhere in the rest of the world. Once gone they’re gone forever. That ridiculously overused word unique applies to Florida environments in spades.
The powerbrokers responsible for the existing development patterns in the State are eating those sensitive and irreplaceable environments and in their place are replacing them with one sterile subdivision, regional mall, retail strip center, strip mine, or agricultural field after another. As if we desperately need those rare and hyper-critical types of land use more than we need fresh water, clean air, and healthy ecosystems. It makes me wonder if most Floridians care that their grandchildren and great grandchildren will be left with little but concrete pavements, an aridified climate, and stagnant drainage canals.
The Eating Florida section of this blog has two goals. First, to help Readers understand the land use patterns and development trends that led to present-day Florida and the inevitable consequences of those trends — enormous profits for some and environmental degredation of all. Land, that’s what it’s all about. Land and how we’re using it. What I’m really talking about is land as it’s affected by four very easy to appreciate elements: limitless greed, easy-virtue politicians, inadequate regulatory enforcement, and an indifferent populace. Second, and most importantly, this book identifies ways ordinary citizens can change those patterns and presents realistic, workable strategies to make that happen. The blog will also provide a hard look at the State’s future if the existing patterns of landscape alteration continue.
Although the word Eating, as used in the title, may not be the most technically accurate way to describe what’s happening to Florida, it conjures up the very real image of fat politicians and their greedy powerbroker lords and masters feeding at the trough. The sobering thing is, Eating applies perfectly to the Florida of the future if the status quo remains the rule since numerous sensitive environments will be consumed in the development process.
Although the jury is still out on that issue we’re closing in on the twelve o’clock witching hour. Decision time stares us in the face. As the well-respected biologist Ernest Partridge writes:

In a vast library of published books and papers, these scientists warn us that if civilization continues on its present course, unspeakable devastation awaits us or our near descendants. Turning away from that “present course” toward “sustainability” will be difficult, costly and uncertain but far preferable to a continuation of “business (and policy) as usual.”

But that’s what this blog is all about, to open Readers’ eyes to Florida’s harsh realities. To look past the sun and surf, the glitz and glitter, not to mention the bullshit peddled by shameless politicians and their powerbroker patrons, to see how the land has been drastically altered in such an astoundingly short time. To see how Florida’s natural places are being eaten as you read this page. To get you to realize what’s been done right and what’s been done horribly wrong, both in cities and in the countryside. My purpose in all this effort is to ensure that Readers recognize the Wizard at work, only it’s not Kansas or Oz we’ll be looking at but the powerbrokers who have shamelessly manipulated Florida politics for decades and in the process have gotten fat by eating one environment after another.
But why should ordinary people like you and me care? Because sensitive environments in the State have moved rapidly up the ladder of negative urban and consequences until they have reached a dramatic crossroad. Turn one direction and the consequence is the chaos of uncontrolled growth and non-sustainable social and economic conditions. Turn in another direction and the result is slightly more controlled growth that will still destroy the environment but at a somewhat slower pace than the first choice. Turn toward the third direction and the consequences are controlled growth that will not destroy what’s left of our natural environments and will preserve the remaining parts for future generations.
The critical problem is that decisions about which direction the State should take are being made by the Big Three powerbrokers — land developers, mining companies, and agribusinesses — meeting behind closed doors with their well-controlled politician pals. Not by ordinary citizens. And that’s the other real challenge this book addresses head-on.
One intriguing way to think about Florida is that’s where one of the country’s last high stakes poker games in real estate development is being played. Only the table stakes are the future of human settlement as well as the future of fragile environments throughout the State. So, who are the players in this high-stakes poker game? The list below ranks the dramatis personae with respect to their relative importance and power.

1)         Land Developers/Large-Scale Agribusinesses/Mining Companies
2)         Three-way tie, see #1
3)         Three-way tie, see #1
4)         Federal/State/Local Politicians (in that order)
5)         U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6)         Other Federal Agencies (EPA, Fish & Wildlife Service, etc.)
7)         State Agencies
8)         Environmental/Conservation Organizations
9)         Florida Residents/Voters

The Big Three powerbrokers are tied for first place because they are equally adept at stuffing munificent campaign contributions into the pockets of their trained puppets, the fat-cat politicians, who in turn bust their asses to do whatever they are ordered to do by their real bosses, which, naturally, are the powerbrokers. History books and the daily Florida newspapers are filled with mind-boggling examples of the venality and reprehensible actions of the Florida business community in concert with State legislators. The skeptics out there might want to read Carl Hiaasen’s columns in the Miami Herald and the work of investigative reporters Beth Reinhard and Samuel P. Nitze.
Please note the group that is in dead-ass last place on the list of players. Not only are the citizens/voters poorly informed and typically powerless, they simply are regarded by the powerbrokers as brain-dead, expendable pawns whose sole purpose in life is to be moved about the game board and even, if required, sacrificed on the Altar of Profits. That situation will be the status quo and modus operandi until and unless a populist movement rises up and drives the powerbrokers from center stage. I can hear the negative chorus from a bevy of cynical Readers: “Fat chance of that ever happening in Florida. Get real.”
Perhaps the cynics are correct. Perhaps Florida is already doomed. That’s a very real possibility. But this blog is built around the premise that similar obstacles to preserving our environmental heritage have been overcome in recent Florida history. We do not have to look elsewhere for inspiration. The road map to sustainability and environmental health can be found in places like Lake Apopka, the Kissimmee River, and, most importantly, the Cross-Florida Barge Canal. The critical lessons of environmental preservation are right in front of our eyes. All we have to do is recognize them and act accordingly. And then apply those lessons to other locations throughout the U.S.