Friday, October 6, 2017

Living through the Vietnam War Era: Personal Reflections

Like millions of others, I watched the Ken Burns/Lynn Novick documentary on the Vietnam War. It was a visceral, frequently gut-wrenching, tearful experience made personal by my having progressed from a teenager to a thirty-something adult during the tumultuous years of the late 1950s through 1975. During at least four of those years, I worried off and on about being drafted into the U.S. military and being pulled kicking and screaming into the great maw of the war machine.

Today, it is all but impossible for people born after the 1960s to comprehend the diametrically opposed emotions generated by the Vietnam War that tore the fabric of America apart so terribly it has never been stitched back together. In this short personal reflection, I’ll try to relate one young man’s feelings about that conflict as they changed over time and under the influence of increasing information as well as increasing exposure to the draft.

As might be guessed, my personal understanding of the Vietnam War evolved a great deal with passing time as I gradually become aware of the many facets of that War. As a young Catholic high school-aged teenager and postulant preparing to become a member of the Society of Mary, it is safe to say that I started out as a gung-ho but unthinking supporter of all things Jack Kennedy, including his anti-Communist militarism and the now justly infamous ‘Domino Theory’ that was applied to French Indochina and neighboring South Asian countries. And with all the furor over the battle for applying the rights granted to all citizens by the Constitution to black Americans, it wasn’t until just before graduating from Saint Louis University in the summer of 1966 that the Vietnam War became personal to me.

Prior to that time, I had plowed through two years of college draft deferments without even a first, much less a second, thought about what the end of that deferment actually would mean to me personally. Suddenly, in the summer of 1964, the start of my junior year at Saint Louis University, it hit me. My II-S student deferment had lapsed. As a result, my skinny ass was hanging out there naked with an official draft status of I-A, meaning I was draft eligible.

Lucky for me, the Vietnam War was still simmering and was nowhere close to boiling over. Plus, my draft board apparently had a surplus of young men, age 18 to 21, who had no deferments and would eventually receive letters of invitation from the Board to get a medical exam prior to induction into the Army. So, like the stupid kid I was, I simply put the possibility of being drafted out of my mind and enrolled for courses like absolutely nothing adverse could happen to me. Though a couple short years later I did discover, to my chagrin, that by 1965 the Selective Service System was inducting an average of about 300,000 young men annually, nearly all of whom wound up in Vietnam.

My initial introduction to Vietnam and what was then called French Indochina was through two spell-binding novels, Graham Greene’s 1955 psychological thriller, The Quiet American, and one that was not nearly so good, The Ugly American, by Eugene Burdick and William Lederer, published in 1958. But it was the Kennedy-Nixon debates that dragged me into the political quagmire that was Vietnam. As a side note, the first three debates I only read about in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch since my TV watching ability was strictly limited since I was boarding at Maryhurst Prep and we were prohibited from watching almost all TV shows. The last debate, broadcast on October 21, 1960, was the only one the entire student body of Maryhurst was allowed to watch live.

In the summer of 1966, only three months short of my wedding date, somehow I became convinced that since I was moving from my parent’s house in north St. Louis to an apartment in the southern part of the City I had to change draft boards. So, one summer morning in mid-May 1966 I called the draft board and told whoever answered the phone that I wanted to change boards. I was told I had to come in and talk to a clerk. My appointment was for the following Tuesday at 10:00 AM at the Federal Building downtown. Great.

That next Tuesday I put on freshly pressed dress shirt and pants, tie, the only decent sport coat I owned, a pair of spit-polished black shoes and off to the U.S. Federal Building I went. When I told a young woman at the information desk I had a 10:00 appointment with a clerk she directed me down the hall to Room whatever. When I arrived I took careful note of the title on the door: Clerk of the Board. Mercy. I wasn’t seeing any old clerk but what turned out to be the Executive Director whose actual title was Clerk of the Draft Board.

I knocked and entered a room as big as a small hockey rink. The proto-typical little old white woman was seated behind an enormous desk at the far end of the room. I walked across the room, introduced myself, and shook her hand. She told me to sit and asked the reason for my visit. I told her blah, blah, blah.

She hesitated a moment and then asked what I was doing with my life. I gave her the short version. I was graduating from SLU in less than a month or so, getting married July, and starting graduate school in the fall. My real goal was to get master’s and doctorate degrees and become a university professor.

She listened patiently and then in a voice devoid of expression told me that if I changed draft boards I would be drafted within two days. Because the board into which I wanted to move had NO young men of draft eligible age without deferments. Holy shit. I nearly had a stroke. Another body to be shoved into the Army’s Vietnam meat grinder.

Then she asked if I wanted her advice. Of course, I said, after pulling my tongue out of my throat and making sure my heart was still beating. She told me I should write a letter informing her of my pending marriage and a temporary change in domicile. I should keep my parents’ address as my permanent residence because, as she said rather grimly, that year alone my draft board had more than a thousand draft eligible young men with nothing better to do with their lives than serve their country. If and when anything changed my status all I had to do was send her another letter detailing those specifics. And she would keep my documents at the back of the draft eligible file. If Congress declared war, she said, you’ll probably be drafted. But, failing an official Act of Congress declaring war, I should be able to pursue my graduate studies. I nearly jumped across the desk and kissed her.

That started my letter writing program with the Clerk, whose name may have been Hazel T_____, though due to the fog of time I’m not 100 percent certain. I sent her a wedding announcement. A letter documenting my move to a “temporary” address in south St. Louis with my new wife. A birth announcement two years later when our son, David, was born. A copy of my acceptance letter to the doctoral program at the University of Florida. And finally, my new “temporary” address in married student housing in Gainesville.

Not long after arriving at the U of F and starting classes I got into a heated argument with a fellow leftist student in the sociology doctoral program who had an infant and was going through a messy divorce. He yelled at me and accused me of taking advantage of the poor black young men in my draft board. I disagreed, saying I wasn’t doing anything but following the law. If the Clerk of the Board was protecting my ass it wasn’t because of anything I had done or asked to be done. It was pure serendipity on my part and I was thankful as hell no matter what reasons she had for protecting me. I had stumbled into a great deal and wasn’t about to fuck it up. He stomped off, visibly steaming.

Several weeks later I learned that as soon as his divorce decree was final his vindictive ex-wife sent a copy to his Selective Service board. He was drafted a few days later. Two or three days after receiving his induction notice he shot and killed himself rather than submit to the draft. When I heard about his death, my first thought was, why the hell didn’t he go to Canada and fuck the draft? I would have in a heartbeat had I found myself in that situation. His death upset me a great deal but . . . what could I or anyone do?

December 1, 1969, marked the date of the first Selective Service (conscription) lottery held since 1942. But, because I was 26, married, and had a child, I was not eligible for the lottery, especially since Congress had never declared war. Had I been eligible, my lottery number would have been 112 and my skinny white ass would have been drafted. But, during those several years that the Vietnam War went from nearly invisible to hot on all burners, that little old lady protected my ass. Without her counsel I would have changed draft boards and exposed my tender body to the terrors of boot camp and then the rigors of military service.

It should be noted that I had started 1966 as vaguely favoring U.S. involvement in Vietnam. During that summer I worked at the St. Louis County Planning Department with a young woman named Ginger Harris, who strongly opposed the War. Arguing with her over our lunch breaks slowly led to a sea change in my position. By the end of summer 1966, I was 100 percent opposed to the War and couldn’t imagine what I’d do if drafted, though Canada beckoned. But, by that time I had been saved by my own personal, white-haired, Fairy Godmother and seldom actively worried about being drafted, though the specter of being forced into the military was never far from my mind.

Many years ago, after thinking long and hard about that situation, I came to the conclusion that the U of F grad student who excoriated me for elitist behavior had been right. No, I had not precipitated what transpired or even thought the possibility existed of suggesting it to the Clerk of the Board. But I had directly benefited from the white privilege shared by the Clerk and me. Of course, I had no way of knowing if a white or black guy from my local draft board had been drafted in my place. So, whether I had benefited unfairly from her action is somewhat up in the air. Though it is certain that my local board had more black registrants than white, thus the chance of a black guy being sucked up in the draft instead of me was high.

Did I ever consider back then that I had benefited unfairly from the Clerk’s unanticipated patronage? Of course I did. But, since I hated the Vietnam War, I rationalized the actions of the Clerk and my acquiescence and simply put the situation out of my mind. I was tremendously relieved at not being forced to join the military or to flee to Canada, a choice I had considered a great deal though I’ll never be certain if I would have followed through since Sandy strongly opposed it. Once safe from being drafted, I did not allow myself to think about how that security had come about.

So, yes, in at least some ways I knew I had benefited from white privilege but didn’t give a shit since I thought my very life was at stake. I rationalized my behavior and refused to acknowledge reality. A great example of white privilege hard at work and how whites like me fail to see it for what it is.

Thursday, October 5, 2017

Reducing Mass Shootings

Another slaughter of innocents by a whacko gunman, this one in Las Vegas. I can hear the anguished outcries from families of lost ones, from outraged citizens who are sick of death by gun-wielding murderers, from politicians who want to be seen as empathetic, at least until the slaughter fades from the front pages. But haven’t we heard all that before multiple times? Remember Columbine High, Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, and many, many others?

Obviously, crafting and implementing a workable solution to this problem has proven far too difficult for us as a society and a country. So, we have shrugged our collective shoulders and agreed that having guns available to every American is far more important than protecting the lives of innocents. Because that’s who we Americans are, gun obsessed people.

Some claim we can reduce mass shootings by writing effective laws that limit the scope of the Second Amendment, just as we have with the First and other Amendments. But I firmly believe the only way to address the problem is to repeal the Second Amendment, universally ban the sale and ownership of handguns and assault rifles, and regulate long guns and the sale of ammunition. Nothing short of that measure will be effective.

Failing that step, we should stop the public weeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth when innocents are gunned down. It doesn’t reflect well on us. After all, we are the ones who allow these tragedies to happen.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

What I Believe

I had been tempted to title this little essay, What Do You Believe? But I quickly came to the conclusion that I don’t give a rat’s ass about what many other people believe since so much of it is bizarre crap. That list includes people who are creationists, young Earthers, climate change deniers, conspiracy theorists, bible thumping fundamentalists, occultists, chem-trail whackos, anti-vaccine peddlers, paranormal activity enthusiasts, GMO opponents, white nationalists/white supremacists, misogynists, racists, nativist immigrant haters, pederasts—especially those in ministerial ranks, Rush Limbaugh supporters, Trumpers and other right-wingnuts like Pat Buchanan and Sean Hannity, libertarian ideologues, LGBTQ opponents, Ayn Rand fanatics, Grover Norquist inspired anti-taxers, etc. And I can’t forget followers of Michel Foucault, Peter Berger, Thomas Luckmann, Jean Baudrillard, Paul Feyerabend, and many other postmodern intellectuals who reject objective knowledge.

In particular, I want to call out those who are convinced that mere belief trumps all requirements for facts or evidence. Here I mean people who have lost their grip on reason and, thus, reality and have fallen into the pit of magical thinking, no matter how revered they may be in academia. I especially reject dirty political tricks, immigrant bashing, gerrymandering, demagoguery, and vote suppression practiced by any political party or candidate.

Here’s what I believe; be warned this list is not in any particular order of importance and is far from inclusive.

Reason
Objective evidence/facts
Left-Wing politics
Science
Science-based skepticism
Creation science and the Young Earth Theory are shameless nonsense
“Fortune favors the prepared mind” -- Louis Pasteur
Evolution
Global warming/climate change
Fairness/justice
Equality
Liberty/freedom
Civil liberties
Family
Love
Friendship
Moral behavior
Individual responsibility matters but is not the only factor of importance.
Determiniation to succeed
Hard work
Determination and hard work are as important as native intelligence.
Human decency
White supremacy/white privilege helped me throughout my life.
Community
Tolerance
Altruism
Helping those in need
Competition
Sportsmanship
Feminism
Gender equality
Labor unions
Individual privacy is a Constitutional right.
The USA Patriot Act should be removed from law.
The US Supreme Court has always been highly politicized.
Citizens United v. FEC should be overturned
Environmentalism/Conservation of natural resources
Systematic kindness is laudable and not that random acts bullshit.
Private property rights never take precedence over human rights.
The use of force is seldom a legitimate method of conflict resolution.
Confirming the validity of what you believe
Regretting past hurtful acts is a sign of hard-won maturity.
People who express and define themselves lead more meaningful lives.
Only constrained markets have existed; free markets never have.
Trickle-down economics is a myth that justifies inequality.
Progressive income taxes rule
Estate tax
Politicians should be willing to compromise to get things done.
Euthanasia should be legalized.
The primary role of capitalism is to ensure the moneyed class gets more while all other classes get less.
The death penalty should be abolished.
The Second Amendment should be shitcanned.
Single-payer, government health care should be available for all.
Religious expression has no place in government.
Marriage is between two people in love, regardless of gender.
Welfare is a safety net providing for the needs of the poor.
A country is judged by the way it treats the powerless.
Openness to new experiences is highly desirable.
Conscientiousness is a highly desirable trait.
Liberals are more emotionally expressive, gregarious, and impulsive than conservatives.
People should be open to challenging authority.
George W. Bush and Barack Obama allowed torturers to go unpunished.
Barack Obama allowed the Wall Street oligarchs who created the Great Recession to go unpunished.
Like Immanuel Kant, I believe geography is critical to knowledge.

Although now, for a great many Americans, factual truth is just one option, it isn’t for me since opinion never trumps fact/evidence. I’m happy to belong to what Karl Rove mocked as the reality-based community. I am proud of living in a rational world. I reject those who think they have the freedom to make up shit on the spur of the moment and present it to the gullible public as an alternative reality worthy of consideration. I strongly repudiate the terms post-factual and post-truth and those who pollute the world with such scurrilous nonsense.

When you think about it, what I don’t believe is as important as the other side of that coin. Here’s a partial listing.

I don’t believe Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

Based on his actions as President, I don't believe Barack Obama was honorable or trustworthy.

Based on her actions as a Senator and Secretary of State, I don't believe Hilary Clinton was honorable or trustworthy.

I don’t believe Donald Trump won the popular vote in 2016.

Based on his actions before and after becoming President, I don’t believe Donald Trump is honorable or trustworthy.

Telepathy, extrasensory perception, ghosts, and reincarnation are myths.

Saddam Hussein was never involved in the 9/11 attack.

George W. Bush intentionally lied to Americans about Iraq.

I reject rugged individualism, rigidity, intolerance, zero-sum thinking, xenophobia, people overly enamored with rules and authority, and those with a strong social dominance orientation.

I don’t believe sexual orientation is a choice or a lifestyle.

Sales taxes are an anchor dragging poor people down.

I laugh out loud when people claim that aliens have visited our planet and built the pyramids, Chichén-Itzá, or the Nazca geoglyphs.

I don’t believe that the U.N. or a secretive global elite are trying to create a New World Order and destroy democracy.

Vampires, witches, werewolves, and angels are silly myths.

And, lastly, I really, really don’t believe in and actively detest the conservative ideal of American Exceptionalism.


In my heart of hearts, I firmly believe the unexamined life is not worth living and that it’s far more important to live a meaningful life than to be happy.

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Who Is Right-Wing Jesus?

Although I provided a shorter explanation previously of Right-Wing Jesus, some of you may have skipped past it to get to his really pithy Gospel message. Hahahaha. Sorry, couldn’t resist a self-promo.

So who is Right-Wing Jesus? Simple. He’s the Jesus conservatives hold dear in their innermost core. It’s His Gospel they listen to and not the Good News of Traditional Jesus, who, after all, is far too long-haired radical for their tastes.

Every leftist/liberal/progressive worth her/his salt knows that a great many die-hard conservatives are closely aligned with evangelical/fundamentalist Christianity. The disconnect with that alignment is that those same conservatives hold values and principles that are at direct cross-purposes with mainstream Christianity, such as supporting the torture of accused Muslim terrorists and first-strike warfare as well as adulation of the rich and powerful as favored by God and a striking delight in cutting the WIC Program and school meals for poor children; in this context I have to force myself to not dwell on how much conservatives detest the food stamp program.

The question that occurred to me several years ago was a simple one: how could that be? How could conservatives claim to be strong Christians and hold such remarkably un-Christlike beliefs and values? The answer came to me a week or so ago: the religious beliefs/values conservatives hold dear are primarily those that confirm their ideology. In social psychology that's known as confirmation bias and is also, in my mind at least, combined with more than a little rationalization and cognitive dissonance. In other words, conservatives pick and choose their religion from the Bible to meet and support their ideological preferences. The rest of the New Testament they pay little heed to or interpret it in ways that provide foundation for their values.

To illustrate that very real disconnect between conservatism and Christianity I invented Right-Wing Jesus, who obligingly spouts the amoral garbage conservatives need to believe to maintain their ideology AND their peculiar kind of Christianity.

As a result, you’ll never hear Right-Wing Jesus saying such nonsense as: “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” Here’s another quote from Traditional Jesus that would never come out of the mouth of Right-Wing Jesus or those of conservatives: “How hard it is for the rich to enter the Kingdom of God. Indeed, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

Here’s a clue as to why the Gospel of Right-Wing Jesus is so important for liberals/progressives/leftists. Once you understand Right-Wing Jesus, you’ll better understand what motivates conservatives, no matter what they claim to be in terms of organized religion.

All you have to do now is sit back and relax and let Right-Wing Jesus lay it out for you in simple, easy to understand values that are held deeply by American conservatives. After all, those conservatives believe in Right-Wing Jesus with all their hearts and souls and model their lives and cast their votes according His Gospel. Thus, by understanding the Gospel of Right-Wing Jesus you can better understand American conservatives and their drive to eliminate progressives as an effective voting bloc.

Equality-Inequality-Poverty-Moral Virtue-Gayness from the Gospel According to Right-Wing Jesus

Amen, amen I say unto you, equality is best sought through exercise of the free market, not through government laws, regulations, or programs that restrict those who are in superior positions or who have superior talents.

Hear my words, o ye men of God, inequality is the natural order of things. Human beings, in terms of innate talents and personal attributes, are inherently unequal and a social hierarchy is a natural consequence of that inequality.

The poor will always be among you, but the righteous know that poverty is caused by negative individual personality traits and character defects—including laziness, poorly developed intellectual ability, complaisance, and the lack of competitiveness, frugality, self-discipline, responsibility, and self-reliance, etc.—not by the so-called structural socioeconomic conditions imagined by liberals.

O you men of God, ignore the sophistry of the liberal Pharisees who created social safety net programs like Medicaid, Food Stamps, and WIC to reward godless people who refuse to work. Repeal or reductions of those programs that protect low-income families against catastrophe stem not from misguided hostility but godly fiscal responsibility in policing fraud and ensuring efficiency (meaning removing all the lazy work shirkers who had previously been eligible).

Hear ye o people of God, race-based affirmative action and the women's rights movement are agents of the devil himself that foster prejudice by undermining equality and by denying opportunities to those who are equally or more qualified to serve the Lord and the government. Those misbegotten programs created by liberal Pharisees do a great deal more harm than good by generating anger and resentment against the particular communities they pretend to serve and actually promote the very disharmony they supposedly are called upon to alleviate.

Medicaid is welfare for the undeserving and irresponsible. The best way to cut down on the innate fraud of that system is to force adults on Medicaid to work, require enrollees to get tested for illegal drugs, cap the length of time people can stay on the program, and limit the number of people who can be on the program at once. Millions of lazy, undeserving work shirkers stay on Medicaid when they are no longer eligible.

Chaste, spiritually minded, and religious people are favored by the Lord God and are morally superior to those weak-kneed, back sliding sinners who are not.

Hear ye o people of God, a powerful centralized government threatens the individual, family, and private institutions and seeks uniformity and absolute compliance on the part of weak-willed citizens. Government, by its very nature, is inefficient, incompetent, wasteful, power hungry, and morally corrupt.

Hear my words ye men of God, homosexuality is an unnatural abomination, a lifestyle choice people freely make; those who practice it commit inherently repugnant and evil acts. Homosexual acts are as immoral as incest and bestiality. Know ye that same sex unions are a direct threat to marriage and the family.

Local governance is godly only if the local jurisdiction is conservative. If it’s not conservative, conservative politicians who control the state legislature must revoke whatever local regulations have been passed to help the undeserving and irresponsible poor, like higher minimum wage laws.

As ordained by godly men, women of childbearing age and older are obliged to cover their bodies entirely, no matter if they claim that dress makes them uncomfortable and hot. For it is written that no woman should salaciously tempt innocent men with their disgusting, slutty, and all but irresistible exposed flesh.


Let us pray, you people of God, for conservatives who “put faith and family, not government and bureaucracy, at the center of [their] lives.” And thank you, Brother Donald, for that inspiration.

------------------------

Can I get a chorus of loud AMENS brothers and sisters to that good news of the gospel according to Right-Wing Jesus?

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Right-Wing Jesus Quotes the Old Testament

Proverbs 1, 13: All kinds of precious wealth shall we gain; we shall fill our houses with booty.

Proverbs 3, 5-6: Trust wholeheartedly in the Lord, put no faith in your own perception; in every course you take, have him in mind: He will see that your paths are smooth.

Proverbs 3, 9-10: Honor the Lord with your wealth, with the first fruits of all your produce; then will your barns be filled with grain and your vats will overflow with new wine.

Proverbs 5, 23: Wicked men will die from lack of discipline; through the greatness of their folly they will be lost.

Proverbs 8, 27-31: When the Lord established the heavens I was there, when He marked out the vault over the face of the deep; when He made firm the skies above, when He fixed fast the foundations of the earth; when He set the sea its limit so that the waters should not transgress His command; then I was beside Him as His craftsman and I was His delight day by day, playing before Him all the while, playing on the surface of His earth; and I found delight in the sons of man.

Proverbs 10, 3-4: The Lord permits not the just to go hungry but the cravings of the wicked He thwarts. The slack hand brings poverty, but the hand of the diligent enriches.

Proverbs 10, 22: It is the Lord’s blessing that brings wealth, and no effort can substitute for it.

Proverbs 12, 11: He who tills his own land has food in plenty, but he who follows idle pursuits is a fool.

Proverbs 12, 27: The slothful man catches not his prey but the wealth of the diligent man is great.

Proverbs 13, 4: The soul of the sluggard craves in vain but the diligent soul is amply satisfied.

Proverbs 13, 8: A man’s riches serve as ransom for his life but the poor man heeds no rebuke.

Proverbs 14, 20: Even by his neighbors the poor man is hated but the friends of the rich are many.

Proverbs 19, 6-7: Many curry favor with the noble, all are friends of the man with something to give. All the poor man’s brothers hate him; how much more do his friends shun him.

Proverbs 19, 10: Luxury is not befitting a fool; much less should a slave rule over princes.

Leviticus 24, 19-21: Anyone who injures their neighbor shall receive the same in return. Limb for limb, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The same injury that a man gives another shall be inflicted on him in return. Whoever kills an animal must make restitution, but whoever kills a human being is to be put to death.


The Gospel according to Right-Wing Jesus 02

“Verily, verily, I say unto you, behold the five inspired essentials no man should live without: Faith, Family, Friends, Flag, and Firearms. Let no man tell you differently under pain of the loss of life eternal.”

“Amen, amen, it is deeply Christian to go to the judges citing religious faith to avoid paying for female employees’ contraception.”

“Protecting the standing of the most dominant conservative political party is among the greatest moral values. In very close elections, even seemingly small effects can have great consequences and the anti-Christ, atheist Democrats could get elected.”

“Right-Wing Jesus loves everybody but He won’t make decorated cookies or wedding cakes for queer couples because He believes in one man, one woman marriages are the only ones approved by the Father in Heaven. Thus, all ungodly people who choose queer lifestyles should abandon their abominable perversions.”

“The rich became rich by hard work alone, so they deserve what they have and are beloved by God. The undeserving poor got where they are because they have neither grit nor merit.”

“The rich are rich because of their sterling character and piety. Poor people are poor because they make bad choices, lack initiative and responsibility, or because they don’t have the right qualities, such as intelligence, determination, and fortitude, not because the system is flawed or unfair. Structural inequality is a dangerous myth that all followers of Right-Wing Jesus must reject.”

“For conservatives, being born into wealth and upper-socio-economic class status is a sure sign of God’s favor and of their righteousness before Right-Wing Jesus. The power and strength that come from that status combined with being conservative are signs that in the battle between evil collectivism and godly individualism that defines the human race; there is no question God is on the side of the righteous.”

“Conservativism is a stamp of Christian fidelity; those anointed ones thus blessed are invited to pass directly into the Kingdom of God.”


“Any form of economic redistribution from the hard working upper income to the undeserving and irresponsible low income is anathema to RWJ and intolerable to the Kingdom of God.”